Integrating evidence, models, and clinical reasoning

Generative-Mechanism Research

Physiolog integrates findings from empirical physiological research into explicit, mechanism-based models. These models are tested across appropriate simulation environments and compared back against empirical evidence, then translated into transparent teaching tools and reproducible research models. The ultimate goal is to improve physiology learning and bring stronger mechanistic models into clinical reasoning through models4PT and the Clinical Inference Engine.

Research Pipeline

The workflow connects existing physiological evidence to explicit mechanisms, tests those mechanisms without privileging one engine, and returns their predictions to the evidence.

  1. 01

    Integrate the evidence

    Synthesize findings, theories, and measurements from existing physiological research.

  2. 02

    State the mechanism

    Express the proposed explanation as equations, assumptions, units, state variables, and observable predictions.

  3. 03

    Implement the model

    Use the model scale and simulation environments best suited to the mechanism and research question.

  4. 04

    Compare simulations

    Test behavior across versioned models, engines, scenarios, parameters, outputs, and tolerances.

  5. 05

    Return to the evidence

    Compare predictions back to empirical findings and investigate disagreement, uncertainty, and missing mechanisms.

  6. 06

    Advance learning and reasoning

    Translate supported mechanisms into teaching tools, models4PT research models, and the Clinical Inference Engine.

Model Ecosystem

These resources are complementary. Each contributes a different scale, capability, or source of evidence to the same research process.

ResourceRoleContribution
PhysiologLearning and question formationSmall browser models make focused causal relationships visible and independently explainable.
Physiome Model RepositoryPublic model structuresCited CellML models provide established mechanisms, model families, and parameter references.
JSimEquation-based execution and analysisUnit checking, parameter estimation, mixed equation systems, and CellML/SBML interchange support formal model testing.
HumModWhole-body comparisonOffline experiments examine integrative feedback, longer time scales, and cross-system responses.
Empirical evidenceIndependent constraintBroad PubMed searches will support evidence discovery and import, while experimental and clinical findings test whether modeled mechanisms remain plausible.
models4PTResearch destinationReproducible physiological mechanisms and evidence support models for physical therapy reasoning.

Current Status

In progress

JSim modernization

Reproducible builds and numerical-compatibility baselines must be completed before modernized JSim outputs are accepted as research baselines.

Available offline

HumMod 1.6.1 reference

The intact standalone model is available for whole-body experiments, with protocols, analysis, results, and provenance kept in a separate research repository.

Planned

Common experiment record

A shared comparison format will record model and engine versions, units, initial conditions, interventions, outputs, tolerances, and acceptance criteria.

First Validation Pilots

The initial studies test both the physiology and the reproducibility of the comparison workflow.

01

Blood pressure and arterial compliance

Compare a cited lumped-parameter Physiome model in JSim with the browser pressure model, HumMod scenarios, and empirical reference ranges.

02

Orthostatic response

Compare focused circulation and autonomic models with intact HumMod, then identify the minimum mechanisms needed for a transparent teaching model.

03

Muscle or oxygen transport

Test the workflow outside lumped cardiovascular models and determine whether the comparison method generalizes across model families.

Research Standards

  • 1No model or engine is treated as ground truth.
  • 2Model and engine versions, architecture, units, assumptions, scenarios, and initial conditions are recorded.
  • 3Solver settings, tolerances, outputs, and acceptance criteria remain part of the evidence.
  • 4Disagreements are investigated and reported rather than averaged away or hidden.
  • 5Model output is hypothesis-generating evidence, not a patient-specific prediction or clinical calculator.
  • 6Only the minimum mechanism needed for a learning objective moves into a public teaching simulation.

Connected Programs

Physiolog Teaching Models

Transparent browser models that translate supported physiological mechanisms into focused learning experiences.

models4PT

Reproducible physiological and computational models intended to support physical therapy reasoning and research.

Clinical Inference Engine

A downstream framework for incorporating physiological mechanisms into diagnosis and treatment reasoning.

Collaborate

Collaboration is welcome on clinical physiology, model comparison, reproducible simulation, clinical inference, and educational model development. Please use the contact information provided on this site or review related work in Sean Collins's professional portfolio.